Skip to main content

Mini-Review #3 - Detective Comics #27: The Dark Knight's Intrusive Debut

Detective Comics #27 (Starting this Issue: the Amazing and Unique Adventures of The Batman!) 

I am the night.

     80 years, seven standalone movies, eight television series and countless comic books later, the Batman certainly has come a long way from his 8-page debut in May of 1939. While he may have evolved into the iconic brooding character that we know and love today, Batman's modern form is a result of hundreds of individual changes and adaptations from swaths of artists and creators who have put their own flair into the character over time. In his very first appearance in that fateful issue of Detective Comics, Batman himself feels like a gimmick and a sticks out like a sore thumb.

Primitive Batman still needs to find his superhero sea legs

     My biggest issue with this issue (haha get it?) is the major tonal shift that happens as soon as the Batman finally shows up. The comic here starts with a quite typical detective setup (which makes sense for... Detective Comics): a man is murdered and his business partners are all sent threatening letters. For some reason, Bruce Wayne is also there. The premise for this story could easily fit into a show like Murder, She Wrote or Columbo, making the inclusion of Batman feel wholly unnecessary to me. The police could definitely control this situation on their own, and there doesn't feel like a need for the Batman. Once Batman finally shows up in this comic (shortly after the murder of the second business partner) the story takes a hard right turn into the absurd to excuse his presence. Suddenly there's acid pits, supervillainous kidnappings, henchmen and giant guinea pig death labs that come out of literally nowhere to justify Batman's existence in the story. All of this, very suddenly, in an eight page comic! It doesn't feel very well planned out at all.

Remember a page ago when this was still kind of a normal detective story? I miss that.

     Now, I understand that many Batman stories, especially in the earlier comics, are quite weird and zany. That's fine, but in this issue Batman is isolated from the colourful villains and the extensive gadgets of his universe and clashes with his surroundings. Instead of the superhero Batman fighting off Joker, or Poison Ivy, or Two-Face, he's fighting... Alfred Stryker, businessman. Terrifying. Batman is out of his normal context, leaving him as quite literally just a random guy in a bat costume running around and punching things. He almost feels like a Scrappy Doo or Jar Jar Binks character, forced into a story to generate interest but ultimately derailing the story for their own reasons. And I'm talking about Batman here. Yikes.

This is how I see Batman in this comic.

     I think the reason that I almost dislike Batman in this issue is the fact that he is viewed more through the perspective of the police and bystanders than Batman himself, and as a vigilante this doesn't paint him very kindly. In the context of this issue's original release, neither the actual readers or the in-universe characters would know anything about this weird guy or where he came from. Batman speaks rarely, actively steals evidence from crime scenes, kills a man and gets away with it. He doesn't show himself to be trustworthy, moral, or even wanted, but he sure is there.

He just actively punched a man into an acid tank and felt no remorse. IN HIS DEBUT! Is this what the kids want?

     On top of this, Batman as a character is incredibly weak in this comic. Sure, he may have a semi- interesting design, but without any trademark tools in the vein of the Batmobile or his Utility Belt (or even just a weapon), it seems like even Batman himself doesn't have a plan for what he's going to do to stop the bad guys. He comes in, unarmed and likely obstructed by his mask, to fight off murderers holding literal smoking guns, and chemical-related mob bosses like it's nobody's business. It's hard to take him seriously when the evidence is pointing to him being a nonsense character.

Is he trying to end up like the rest of his family? Because that's a recipe for disaster.

     I do like Batman. I think almost everybody does. But if Detective Comics #27 was my first exposure to Batman in any form, I would not be a fan of him. Although I appreciate the history of the character and think it was interesting to see from a Media Studies perspective, but in the context of other Batman stories, I don't think the comic holds up. Sorry, Brucey.

Bruce Wayne is such an unimportant character in this comic that this reveal means next to nothing to the reader here. I mean SOMEONE had to be Batman, why not the useless guy?

     

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Detroit: Become Human - Blog #2: M for Machines

I think it’s incredibly fair for Detroit: Become Human to have an M Rating. It deals with heavy themes, including lots of violence and murder (somehow in every character’s arc but especially in Connor’s, the literal homicide investigator), characters like Lieutenant Anderson who swear constantly, signs of alcoholism and drug use (whatever Red Ice), and domestic abuse (including both child and elder abuse). The game also deals with heavy themes of identity along with intense and consequential decision making that younger audiences may not be…mature enough to handle. I don’t think this game would appeal to many kids or younger teens in the first place, and even though it doesn’t involve humans I think the junkyard scene would be traumatizing as well. I can’t imagine this game receiving anything less than a 17+ rating.

Willy vs. Charlie - How Maiming Children Has Changed Through the Age of the Blockbuster

     Roald Dahl's 1964 novel  Charlie and the Chocolate Factory seems to be a story that demands to be put to film. Two completely separate adaptions of this book were put to the big screen 34 years apart, before and during the age of the blockbuster. 1971's Willy Wonka & the Chocolate Factory and 2005's Charlie & the Chocolate Factory both try to cater to the audiences of their times, and as a result end up being two remarkably different films. NOTE: For the purposes of this blog I will be treating Charlie and the Chocolate Factory as a remake/reboot to Willy Wonka & the Chocolate Factory even though they are both technically reiterations of the same book. This just makes it easier to compare them. Willy Wonka... (1971, left) and Charlie ... (2005, right)      Both of these films take a very different approach to the original source material;   while Charlie...  sticks closer to the events of the novel and as a result falls more into the goofy, fant

Flying Rat Man and His Pop Culture Pliability

     Unsurprisingly, Batman has a lot going for him when it comes to versatility. A lot of the elements of Batman's character make him incredibly effective in most environments, from the goofy 60s TV show to the original comics to the grittier world of the Arkham video games and the Christopher Nolan trilogy. I think this is because at his core, Batman is a very simple character; it only takes a few characteristics to make Batman recognizably Batman. If his name is Bruce Wayne, his parents died when he was young, he's rich and he dresses up like a bat to fight crime, then yup, he's Batman! Everything else is up for debate. Trust me, Batman's parents die. They won't let you forget that.      Although there are many other elements that make Batman an icon, different interpretations of his character will use them more or less depending on their target audience. One of the best examples of this is The Boy Wonder, Robin. Much like his original introduct