Skip to main content

Flying Rat Man and His Pop Culture Pliability


     Unsurprisingly, Batman has a lot going for him when it comes to versatility. A lot of the elements of Batman's character make him incredibly effective in most environments, from the goofy 60s TV show to the original comics to the grittier world of the Arkham video games and the Christopher Nolan trilogy. I think this is because at his core, Batman is a very simple character; it only takes a few characteristics to make Batman recognizably Batman. If his name is Bruce Wayne, his parents died when he was young, he's rich and he dresses up like a bat to fight crime, then yup, he's Batman! Everything else is up for debate.

Trust me, Batman's parents die. They won't let you forget that.

     Although there are many other elements that make Batman an icon, different interpretations of his character will use them more or less depending on their target audience. One of the best examples of this is The Boy Wonder, Robin. Much like his original introduction into the comic, Robin is typically placed into the Bat-Universe to make the slightly intimidating character of Batman seem more family friendly. The 60s TV show, the original comics, and the LEGO Batman universe all have Robin as Batman's plucky sidekick who demonstrates the important of friendship and co-operation, as well as giving younger kids a character to relate to. In the more darker iterations of The Caped Crusader, Batman works alone to paint him as a more serious, isolated, or mysterious character.

Holy pandering, Batman!
Or to play up the sadness, Robin gets killed off. Sorry, kids.

     Another big element that changes between iterations of Batman is his vigilantism. While Batman almost always works separately from law enforcement, his willingness to follow rules can change with each interpretation of his character. In the 60s show, Batman works alongside the police, actually attempting to arrest the Riddler like a police officer would in the first episode. This works to appeal to the family values of following rules and listening to authority that kids and parents would appreciate.

     However, unlike his cheery counterpart Superman, Batman has not been typecast as a goody two-shoes. Batman can get edgy if he wants to, and has the flexibility of having this moral grey area that can make him as cheery or dark as needed. Although he doesn't (often) kill people, Batman's ways of fighting crime can also change to meet the needs of the story. Batman can play a more detective-style role (see: Detective Comics), he can be more violent with hand on hand combat (like in the Arkham video games), or he can rely more on his technology to take down criminals (more commonly seen in the 60s show and 90s movies). This versatility is what makes it so easy to transition Batman between different characterizations and types of media.

Same dude. Different contexts.

     Finally, I actually think that the #1 reason that Batman is so adaptable to different media is that he doesn't have any superpowers. Not only does this make him one of the most realistic/human superheroes, but it also means that writers can't rely on his superpowers to get him into trouble or solve his problems. Since Batman's powers can't be the most interesting thing about him, the situations he gets placed in are required to be more unique to keep the story engaging. This allows the world around The Dark Knight (including his villains [especially the Joker], Gotham or Batman's toolset) to set the tone of the media more than his character. 

Batman is never the most interesting thing about the Batman series: it's everything else that he has to deal with.

     The fact that Batman himself is such a blank slate allows writers to fill in the gaps of his character and his universe however they please; this is what makes him such an interesting character to play with. The elements of him that stay consistent (his design, his wealth, his double life) also have a general appeal: he's basically cool to everyone. Whether he's in the post-9/11 world of The Dark Knight trilogy and Gotham, the zany over the top camp Gothams of the 60s TV show or the LEGO Batman series, a blend between the two like the 90s animated series and Batman Returns, or whichever type of universe the comic books decide they want him in this time, Batman will find his place as a suave deadpan crime fighter.

The Bat Symbol represents Batman perfectly: it's iconic because it's simple, cool looking, and a little dark.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Detroit: Become Human - Blog #2: M for Machines

I think it’s incredibly fair for Detroit: Become Human to have an M Rating. It deals with heavy themes, including lots of violence and murder (somehow in every character’s arc but especially in Connor’s, the literal homicide investigator), characters like Lieutenant Anderson who swear constantly, signs of alcoholism and drug use (whatever Red Ice), and domestic abuse (including both child and elder abuse). The game also deals with heavy themes of identity along with intense and consequential decision making that younger audiences may not be…mature enough to handle. I don’t think this game would appeal to many kids or younger teens in the first place, and even though it doesn’t involve humans I think the junkyard scene would be traumatizing as well. I can’t imagine this game receiving anything less than a 17+ rating.

Willy vs. Charlie - How Maiming Children Has Changed Through the Age of the Blockbuster

     Roald Dahl's 1964 novel  Charlie and the Chocolate Factory seems to be a story that demands to be put to film. Two completely separate adaptions of this book were put to the big screen 34 years apart, before and during the age of the blockbuster. 1971's Willy Wonka & the Chocolate Factory and 2005's Charlie & the Chocolate Factory both try to cater to the audiences of their times, and as a result end up being two remarkably different films. NOTE: For the purposes of this blog I will be treating Charlie and the Chocolate Factory as a remake/reboot to Willy Wonka & the Chocolate Factory even though they are both technically reiterations of the same book. This just makes it easier to compare them. Willy Wonka... (1971, left) and Charlie ... (2005, right)      Both of these films take a very different approach to the original source material;   while Charlie...  sticks closer to the events of the novel and as a result falls more into the goofy, fant