Skip to main content

Detroit: Become Human - Blog #2: M for Machines


I think it’s incredibly fair for Detroit: Become Human to have an M Rating. It deals with heavy themes, including lots of violence and murder (somehow in every character’s arc but especially in Connor’s, the literal homicide investigator), characters like Lieutenant Anderson who swear constantly, signs of alcoholism and drug use (whatever Red Ice), and domestic abuse (including both child and elder abuse). The game also deals with heavy themes of identity along with intense and consequential decision making that younger audiences may not be…mature enough to handle. I don’t think this game would appeal to many kids or younger teens in the first place, and even though it doesn’t involve humans I think the junkyard scene would be traumatizing as well. I can’t imagine this game receiving anything less than a 17+ rating.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Detroit: Become Human - Blog #3: Is the Uncanny Valley on Purpose?

            When we first got into this game, I wasn’t sure how I felt about the hyper realistic details of the characters. They obviously didn’t look human, and even though the graphics were just imperfect enough to kind of strike that into that uncanny valley line, I thought it worked for the androids, who purposely mimic human behaviour. Unfortunately, minus their mannerisms, the humans and androids are basically indistinguishable, which does not bode well for the equally uncanny valley human beings. It’s almost perfect, but not quite. Although I typically prefer stylized graphics (since I think in general they age better [see: cartoony Legend of Zelda Wind Waker vs dated Twilight Princess, which both came out on GameCube around the same time]) I feel like they would clash with the grittier realism that the story tries to portray. It’s also harder to be scary (see Zlatik from Toy Story and his monstrosity machin...
2 comments
Read more

Willy vs. Charlie - How Maiming Children Has Changed Through the Age of the Blockbuster

     Roald Dahl's 1964 novel  Charlie and the Chocolate Factory seems to be a story that demands to be put to film. Two completely separate adaptions of this book were put to the big screen 34 years apart, before and during the age of the blockbuster. 1971's Willy Wonka & the Chocolate Factory and 2005's Charlie & the Chocolate Factory both try to cater to the audiences of their times, and as a result end up being two remarkably different films. NOTE: For the purposes of this blog I will be treating Charlie and the Chocolate Factory as a remake/reboot to Willy Wonka & the Chocolate Factory even though they are both technically reiterations of the same book. This just makes it easier to compare them. Willy Wonka... (1971, left) and Charlie ... (2005, right)      Both of these films take a very different approach to the original source material;   while Charlie...  sticks closer to the events of the novel and as a result...
Post a Comment
Read more

Media About Media - "Unedited Footage of a Bear"

by Cameron Mady "Unedited Footage of a Bear" Released December 16 2014 The entire video. **NOTE*** I don't know why the beginning is in tiny text. I've changed it back but it keeps switching to the small text again.       "Unedited Footage of a Bear" is a short video from Adult Swim that comments on the manipulative and intrusive nature of advertisements in modern culture. Consumers fall victim to the empty promises of large corporations and are left to deal with the consequences. People are far too willing to trust the media, and forget that there is almost always an ulterior motive to media production; this could be profit, power, or persuasion. The video claims that advertisements are not for the benefit of the consumer, but rather for the benefit of the company that releases its corrupted messages to the public. "Claridryl targets where yo u're most vulnerable, acts immediately, and lasts indefinitely"     The first ...
Post a Comment
Read more